Which principle emphasizes that private sector entities are not bound by constitutional rulings concerning interrogation?

The principle that emphasizes private sector entities are not bound by constitutional rulings concerning interrogation is rooted in the understanding that the U.S. Constitution primarily governs the actions of governmental entities, ensuring that citizens' rights are protected from government overreach. Private sector entities operate under a different set of guidelines, which typically revolve around contractual obligations and civil law rather than constitutional mandates.

The concept behind this principle is that while government agencies must adhere to constitutional requirements during interrogations—ensuring protections against self-incrimination and the right to counsel—private organizations and businesses do not face the same legal constraints. This allows them to establish their own policies and procedures for conducting interviews and interrogations, often informed by internal considerations such as company policy, industry standards, and legal frameworks that differ from constitutional law.

Recognizing that private entities are often operating under commercial objectives rather than state authority clarifies why they fall outside the scope of constitutional protections that the public expects from law enforcement or government interrogative practices.