What is an example of a soft accusation question?

A soft accusation question is designed to introduce a level of confrontation while still allowing the subject to save face. It typically implies wrongdoing without directly accusing, which can prompt the individual to engage more openly.

The choice that exemplifies a soft accusation question is the one referring to the frequency of the alleged behavior, implying a history of similar actions without a direct accusation. This type of question allows the individual to respond in a way that might lead to a more in-depth discussion about their actions without feeling cornered or defensive.

By asking about past behavior, the interviewer subtly suggests suspicion, prompting the subject to provide justification or clarification about their actions. This approach aligns with the objectives of forensic interviewing, which aims to gather information in a manner that encourages dialogue rather than eliciting a confrontational response.

In contrast, direct questions about specific actions or emotions, such as accusing someone of a crime, inquiring if they feel nervous, or asking about their whereabouts at a given time, do not exemplify the soft accusation strategy. These direct inquiries may lead to defensiveness and inhibit a productive conversation, which is not the goal of a soft accusation technique.