To prove intentional infliction of emotional distress, which of the following must the employee demonstrate?

To prove intentional infliction of emotional distress, the employee must demonstrate that the conduct of the employer was outrageous. This means that the behavior must go beyond all bounds of decency and be regarded as atrocious and utterly intolerable in a civilized community. The standard for this type of claim requires not just demonstrating emotional harm but showing that the conduct was egregious in nature.

Outrageous conduct is often characterized by extreme and outrageous behavior that shocks the conscience. In legal contexts, this standard tries to protect individuals from severe emotional harm resulting from the egregious actions of others, particularly in workplace settings where individuals may be especially vulnerable.

The other options do not align with the legal requirements for proving this type of claim. Simply demonstrating no injury or negligence does not meet the threshold for intentional infliction of emotional distress, and a good intention by the employer would not negate the impact of their behavior if it is found to be outrageous. Thus, the focus on the nature of the conduct itself is central to proving the claim.